Loading...

How to purchase an alternative medicine paper undergrad writing academic


Scientific writing made easy a step by step guide to undergraduate nbsp

Abstract Scientific writing, while an indispensable step of the scientific process, is often overlooked in undergraduate courses in favor of maximizing class time devoted to scientific concepts.However, the ability to effectively communicate research findings is crucial for success in the biological sciences.

Graduate students are encouraged to publish early and often, and professional scientists are generally evaluated by the quantity of articles published and the number of citations those articles receive Tips for academic writing http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/jbednar/writingtips.html   As part of our study skills services we provide help with essay structure,  .Graduate students are encouraged to publish early and often, and professional scientists are generally evaluated by the quantity of articles published and the number of citations those articles receive.

It is therefore important that undergraduate students receive a solid foundation in scientific writing early in their academic careers.In order to increase the emphasis on effective writing in the classroom, we assembled a succinct step‐by‐Step guide to scientific writing that can be directly disseminated to undergraduates enrolled in biological science courses Think about what we have covered in the section on Critical writing and ask yourself   As you read the essay try to think what feedback you would give for the  .In order to increase the emphasis on effective writing in the classroom, we assembled a succinct step‐by‐Step guide to scientific writing that can be directly disseminated to undergraduates enrolled in biological science courses.The guide breaks down the scientific writing process into easily digestible pieces, providing concrete examples that students can refer to when preparing a scientific manuscript or laboratory report.By increasing undergraduate exposure to the scientific writing process, we hope to better prepare undergraduates for graduate school and productive careers in the biological sciences.

An introduction to the guide While writing is a critical part of the scientific process, it is often taught secondarily to scientific concepts and becomes an afterthought to students.How many students can you recall who worked on a laboratory assignment or class project for weeks, only to throw together the written report the day before it was due? For many, this pattern occurs because we focus almost exclusively on the scientific process, all but neglecting the scientific writing process.Scientific writing is often a difficult and arduous task for many students.It follows a different format and deviates in structure from how we were initially taught to write, or even how we currently write for English, history, or social science classes.

This can make the scientific writing process appear overwhelming, especially when presented with new, complex content.

However, effective writing can deepen understanding of the topic at hand by compelling the writer to present a coherent and logical story that is supported by previous research and new results.Clear scientific writing generally follows a specific format with key sections: an introduction to a particular topic, hypotheses to be tested, a description of methods, key results, and finally, a discussion that ties these results to our broader knowledge of the topic (Day and Gastel 2012).This general format is inherent in most scientific writing and facilitates the transfer of information from author to reader if a few guidelines are followed.Here, we present a succinct step‐by‐step guide that lays out strategies for effective scientific writing with the intention that the guide be disseminated to undergraduate students to increase the focus on the writing process in the college classroom.While we recognize that there are no hard and fast rules when it comes to scientific writing, and more experienced writers may choose to disregard our suggestions these guidelines will assist undergraduates in overcoming the initial challenges associated with writing scientific papers.

This guide was inspired by Joshua Schimel's Writing Science: How to Write Papers that Get Cited and Proposals that Get Funded—an excellent book about scientific writing for graduate students and professional scientists—but designed to address undergraduate students.While the guide was written by a group of ecologists and evolutionary biologists, the strategies and suggestions presented here are applicable across the biological sciences and other scientific disciplines.Regardless of the specific course being taught, this guide can be used as a reference when writing scientific papers, independent research projects, and laboratory reports.For students looking for more in‐depth advice, additional resources are listed at the end of the guide.To illustrate points regarding each step of the scientific writing process, we draw examples throughout the guide from Kilner et al.

(2004), a paper on brown‐headed cowbirds—a species of bird that lays its eggs in the nests of other bird species, or hosts—that was published in the journal Science.

Help me with a alternative medicine paper plagiarism-free academic cse 7 days us letter size

investigate why cowbird nestlings tolerate the company of host offspring during development rather than pushing host eggs out of the nest upon hatching to monopolize parental resources.While articles in the journal Science are especially concise and lack the divisions of a normal scientific paper, Kilner et al.(2004) offers plenty of examples of effective communication strategies that are utilized in scientific writing Example essays Skills Hub University of Sussex.

(2004) offers plenty of examples of effective communication strategies that are utilized in scientific writing.

We hope that the guidelines that follow, as well as the concrete examples provided, will lead to scientific papers that are information rich, concise, and clear, while simultaneously alleviating frustration and streamlining the writing process.Undergraduate guide to writing in the biological sciences The before steps The scientific writing process can be a daunting and often procrastinated “last step” in the scientific process, leading to cursory attempts to get scientific arguments and results down on paper.However, scientific writing is not an afterthought and should begin well before drafting the first outline.Successful writing starts with researching how your work fits into existing literature, crafting a compelling story, and determining how to best tailor your message to an intended audience.Research how your work fits into existing literature It is important to decide how your research compares to other studies of its kind by familiarizing yourself with previous research on the topic.

If you are preparing a laboratory write‐up, refer to your textbook and laboratory manual for background information.For a research article, perform a thorough literature search on a credible search engine (e.Ask the following questions: What do we know about the topic? What open questions and knowledge do we not yet know? Why is this information important? This will provide critical insight into the structure and style that others have used when writing about the field and communicating ideas on this specific topic.

It will also set you up to successfully craft a compelling story, as you will begin writing with precise knowledge of how your work builds on previous research and what sets your research apart from the current published literature.Understand your audience (and write to them) In order to write effectively, you must identify your audience and decide what story you want them to learn.While this may seem obvious, writing about science as a narrative is often not done, largely because you were probably taught to remain dispassionate and impartial while communicating scientific findings.The purpose of science writing is not explaining what you did or what your audience to understand.Start by asking: Who is my audience? What are their goals in reading my writing? What message do I want them to take away from my writing? There are great resources available to help science writers answer these questions (Nisbet 2009, Baron 2010).

If you are interested in publishing a scientific paper, academic journal websites also provide clear journal mission statements and submission guidelines for prospective authors.The most effective science writers are familiar with the background of their topic, have a clear story that they want to convey, and effectively craft their message to communicate that story to their audience.Introduction The Introduction sets the tone of the paper by providing relevant background information and clearly identifying the problem you plan to address.Think of your Introduction as the beginning of a funnel: Start wide to put your research into a broad context that someone outside of the field would understand, and then narrow the scope until you reach the specific question that you are trying to answer (Fig.Clearly state the wider implications of your work for the field of study, or, if relevant, any societal impacts it may have, and provide enough background information that the reader can understand your topic.Perform a thorough sweep of the literature; however, do not parrot everything you find.Background information should only include material that is directly relevant to your research and fits into your story; it does not need to contain an entire history of the field of interest.

How to buy a custom paper alternative medicine ama american single spaced 1 hour

Remember to include in‐text citations in the format of (Author, year published) for each paper that you cite and avoid using the author's name as the subject of the sentence: Figure 1 Framing a scientific paper.The structure of a paper mirrors that of an hourglass, opening broadly and narrowing to the specific question, hypothesis, methods, and results of the study.

Effective papers widen again in the discussion and conclusion, connecting the study back to the existing literature and explaining how the current study filled a knowledge gap Essay writing Study Skills University of Derby.Effective papers widen again in the discussion and conclusion, connecting the study back to the existing literature and explaining how the current study filled a knowledge gap.

The structure of a paper mirrors that of an hourglass, opening broadly and narrowing to the specific question, hypothesis, methods, and results of the study.Effective papers widen again in the discussion and conclusion, connecting the study back to the existing literature and explaining how the current study filled a knowledge gap Model Papers from the Disciplines Center for Teaching and Learning.Effective papers widen again in the discussion and conclusion, connecting the study back to the existing literature and explaining how the current study filled a knowledge gap.(2004) found that cowbird nestlings use host offspring to procure more food Model Papers from the Disciplines Center for Teaching and Learning.(2004) found that cowbird nestlings use host offspring to procure more food.” Instead, use an in‐text citation: “Cowbird nestlings use host offspring to procure more food.2004) Upon narrowing the background information presented to arrive at the specific focus of your research, clearly state the problem that your paper addresses.

The problem is also known as the knowledge gap, or a specific area of the literature that contains an unknown question or problem (e.

, it is unclear why cowbird nestlings tolerate host offspring when they must compete with host offspring for food) (refer to the section “Research how your work fits into existing literature”).The knowledge gap tends to be a small piece of a much larger field of study.Explicitly state how your work will contribute to filling that knowledge gap.This is a crucial section of your manuscript; your discussion and conclusion should all be aimed at answering the knowledge gap that you are trying to fill.

In addition, the knowledge gap will drive your hypotheses and questions that you design your experiment to answer.Your hypothesis will often logically follow the identification of the knowledge gap (Table 1).Define the hypotheses you wish to address, state the approach of your experiment, and provide a 1–2 sentence overview of your experimental design, leaving the specific details for the methods section.If your methods are complicated, consider briefly explaining the reasoning behind your choice of experimental design.Here, you may also state your system, study organism, or study site, and provide justification for why you chose this particular system for your research.

Is your system, study organism, or site a good representation of a more generalized pattern? Providing a brief outline of your project will allow your Introduction to segue smoothly into your 4 section.Constructing a hypothesis A hypothesis is a testable explanation of an observed occurrence in nature, or, more specifically, why something you observed is occurring.Hypotheses relate directly to research questions, are written in the present tense, and can be tested through observation or experimentation.Although the terms “hypothesis” and “prediction” are often incorrectly used interchangeably, they refer to different but complementary concepts.

A hypothesis attempts to explain the mechanism underlying a pattern, while a prediction states an expectation regarding the results.

How to ace or at least pass undergraduate essay exams tim nbsp

While challenging to construct, hypotheses provide powerful tools for structuring research, generating specific predictions, and designing experiments.Example: Observation: Brown‐headed cowbird nestlings refrain from ejecting host offspring from the nest even though those offspring compete for limited parental resources.Research question: Why do nestling cowbirds tolerate the presence of host offspring in the nest? Hypothesis: The presence of host offspring causes parents to bring more food to the nest Best websites to buy an paper alternative medicine PhD 7 days Writing from scratch CSE.Research question: Why do nestling cowbirds tolerate the presence of host offspring in the nest? Hypothesis: The presence of host offspring causes parents to bring more food to the nest.

Prediction: Cowbird nestlings will grow at a faster rate in nests that contain host offspring.

Materials and Methods The 4 section is arguably the most straightforward section to write; you can even begin writing it while performing your experiments to avoid forgetting any details of your experimental design .Materials and Methods The 4 section is arguably the most straightforward section to write; you can even begin writing it while performing your experiments to avoid forgetting any details of your experimental design.In order to make your paper as clear as possible, organize this section into subsections with headers for each procedure you describe (e .In order to make your paper as clear as possible, organize this section into subsections with headers for each procedure you describe (e.We recommend reusing these headers in your Results and Discussion to help orient your readers.The aim of the 4 section is to demonstrate that you used scientifically valid methods and provide the reader with enough information to recreate your experiment.In chronological order, clearly state the procedural steps you took, remembering to include the model numbers and specific settings of all equipment used (e., centrifuged in Beckman Coulter Benchtop Centrifuge Model Allegra X ‐15R at 12,000 ×g for 45 minutes).

In addition to your experimental procedure, describe any statistical analyses that you performed.While the parameters you include in your 4 section will vary based on your experimental design, we list common ones in Table 2 (Journal of Young Investigators 2005) that are usually mentioned.If you followed a procedure developed from another paper, cite the source that it came from and provide a general description of the method.There is no need to reiterate every detail, unless you deviated from the source and changed a step in your procedure.However, it is important to provide enough information that the reader can follow your methods without referring to the original source.

As you explain your experiment step by step, you may be tempted to include qualifiers where sources of error occurred (e., the tube was supposed to be centrifuged for 5 minutes, but was actually centrifuged for 10).However, generally wait until the Discussion to mention these subjective qualifiers and avoid discussing them in the 4 section.Common parameters included in the 4 section • Site characterization: Description of field site or site where experiment was performed • Experimental design: Sample preparation Important equipment settings (e., temperature of incubation, speed of centrifuge) Amount of reagents used • Statistical analyses conducted (e., ANOVA, linear regression) The 4 section should be written in the past tense: “On hatch day, and every day thereafter for 9 days, we weighed chicks, measured their tibia length, and calculated the instantaneous growth constant K to summarize rates of mass gain and skeletal growth.

2004) While it is generally advisable to use active voice throughout the paper (refer to the section “Putting It All Together,” below), you may want to use a mixture of active and passive voice in the 4 section in order to vary sentence structure and avoid repetitive clauses.Results The Results section provides a space to present your key findings in a purely objective manner and lay the foundation for the Discussion section, where those data are subjectively interpreted.

So who is good enough to get into cambridge education the nbsp

Before diving into this section, identify which graphs, tables, and data are absolutely necessary for telling your story.

Then, craft a descriptive sentence or two that summarizes each result, referring to corresponding table and figure numbers.

Rather than presenting the details all at once, write a short summary about each data set 2 Feb 2012 - Get our newsletter   FSM rightly says that rigorous academic standards and evidence for   In Australia, complementary medicines are regulated as medicines by the   The survey found most pharmacists supported undergraduate CAM   Write an article and join a growing community of more than 66,900  .Rather than presenting the details all at once, write a short summary about each data set.

If you carried out a complicated study, we recommend dividing your results into multiple sections with clear headers following the sequence laid out in the 4 section.As you relate each finding, be as specific as possible and describe your data biologically rather than through the lens of statistics When you apply to a Medicine or Dentistry course the university admissions staff will read   Read one or two newspaper articles a week specifically relating to health   Any experience you gain, write down that evening what you saw and what you   Alternatives to Medicine afternoon is for Year 12 students, takes place in  .As you relate each finding, be as specific as possible and describe your data biologically rather than through the lens of statistics.While statistical tests give your data credibility by allowing you to attribute observed differences to nonrandom variation, they fail to address the actual meaning of the data When you apply to a Medicine or Dentistry course the university admissions staff will read   Read one or two newspaper articles a week specifically relating to health   Any experience you gain, write down that evening what you saw and what you   Alternatives to Medicine afternoon is for Year 12 students, takes place in  .While statistical tests give your data credibility by allowing you to attribute observed differences to nonrandom variation, they fail to address the actual meaning of the data.Instead, translate the data into biological terms and refer to statistical results as supplemental information, or even in parenthetical clauses (Schimel 2012).

For example, if your dependent variable changed in response to a treatment, report the magnitude and direction of the effect, with the P‐value in parentheses xlphp.org/term-paper/help-me-write-my-college-political-science-term-paper-academic-college-sophomore-british-privacy.For example, if your dependent variable changed in response to a treatment, report the magnitude and direction of the effect, with the P‐value in parentheses.“By day 8, cowbirds reared with host young were, on average, 14% heavier than cowbirds reared alone (unpaired t 16 = −2.05 (or your other statistical tests yielded nonsignificant results), report any noticeable trends in the data rather than simply dismissing the treatment as having no significant effect (Fry 1993).By focusing on the data and leaving out any interpretation of the results in this section, you will provide the reader with the tools necessary to objectively evaluate your findings.Discussion and conclusion The Discussion section usually requires the most consideration, as this is where you interpret your results.

Your Discussion should form a self‐contained story tying together your Introduction and Results sections (Schimel 2012).One potential strategy for writing the Discussion is to begin by explicitly stating the main finding(s) of your research (Cals and Kotz 2013).Remind the reader of the knowledge gap identified in the Introduction to re‐spark curiosity about the question you set out to answer.Then, explicitly state how your experiment moved the field forward by filling that knowledge gap.After the opening paragraph of your Discussion, we suggest addressing your question and hypotheses with specific evidence from your results.

If there are multiple possible interpretations of a result, clearly lay out each competing explanation.In the cowbird example, a higher feeding rate in the presence of host offspring could indicate either (1) that the parents were more responsive to the begging behavior of their own species or (2) that the collective begging behavior of more offspring in the nest motivated the host parents to provide additional food (Kilner et al.Presenting and evaluating alternative explanations of your findings will provide clear opportunities for future research.However, be sure to keep your Discussion concrete by referring to your results to support each given interpretation.

Intermingled with these interpretations, reference preexisting literature and report how your results relate to previous findings (Casenove and Kirk 2016).Ask yourself the following questions: How do my results compare to those of similar studies? Are they consistent or inconsistent with what other researchers have found? If they are inconsistent, discuss why this might be the case.

Best website to buy a alternative medicine paper one hour single spaced 13 pages / 3575 words chicago

For example, are you asking a similar question in a different system, organism, or site? Was there a difference in the methods or experimental design? Any caveats of the study (e., small sample size, procedural mistakes, or known biases in the methods) should be transparent and briefly discussed.

The conclusion, generally located in its own short section or the last paragraph of the Discussion, represents your final opportunity to state the significance of your research How to get your first academic paper published Times Higher nbsp.The conclusion, generally located in its own short section or the last paragraph of the Discussion, represents your final opportunity to state the significance of your research.

Rather than merely restating your main findings, the conclusion should summarize the outcome of your study in a way that incorporates new insights or frames interesting questions that arose as a result of your research.Broaden your perspective again as you reach the bottom of the hourglass (Fig.While it is important to acknowledge the shortcomings or caveats of the research project, generally include these near the beginning of the conclusion or earlier in the Discussion 15 Apr 2017 - After my Undergraduate Essay Writing Guide ended up featured in the   There are hundreds of courses at any given university, and a   and the first year of undergraduate medicine came very close to me and whispered in my ear,  you're not one of them - now take your mid-2.i and get out of my sight )..

While it is important to acknowledge the shortcomings or caveats of the research project, generally include these near the beginning of the conclusion or earlier in the Discussion.

You want your take‐home sentences to focus on what you have accomplished and the broader implications of your study, rather than your study's limitations or shortcomings (Schimel 2012).Putting it all together No matter how many boards you stack on top of each other, you still need nails to prevent the pile from falling apart xlphp.org/powerpoint-presentation/should-i-order-a-religious-conflicts-powerpoint-presentation-harvard-a4-british-european-95-pages-26125-words-without-plagiarism.Putting it all together No matter how many boards you stack on top of each other, you still need nails to prevent the pile from falling apart.The same logic applies to a scientific paper.Little things—such as flow, structure, voice, and word choice—will connect your story, polish your paper, and make it enjoyable to read.

The reader should easily be able to move from one concept to another, either within a sentence or between paragraphs.To bolster the flow, constantly remind yourself of the overarching story; always connect new questions with resolutions and tie new concepts to previously presented ideas.As a general rule, try to maintain the same subject throughout a section and mix up sentence structure in order to emphasize different concepts.Keep in mind that words or ideas placed toward the end of a sentence often convey the most importance (Schimel 2012).

The use of active voice with occasional sentences in passive voice will additionally strengthen your writing.Scientific writing is rife with passive voice that weakens otherwise powerful sentences by stripping the subjects of action.However, when used properly, the passive voice can improve flow by strategically placing a sentence's subject so that it echoes the emphasis of the preceding sentence.Compare the following sentences: “The cowbird nestlings tolerated the host nestlings.

” (active) (passive) If host nestlings are the focus of the paragraph as a whole, it may make more sense to present the passive sentence in this case, even though it is weaker than the active version.

While passive and active voices can complement each other in particular situations, you should typically use the active voice whenever possible.Lastly, word choice is critical for effective storytelling (Journal of Young Investigators 2005).Rather than peppering your report or manuscript with overly complicated words, use simple words to lay the framework of your study and discuss your findings.Eliminating any flourish and choosing words that get your point across as clearly as possible will make your work much more enjoyable to read (Strunk and White 1979, Schimel 2012).

Medicine and dentistry tips queen mary university of london

Editing and peer review Although you have finally finished collecting data and writing your report, you are not done yet! Re‐reading your paper and incorporating constructive feedback from others can make the difference between getting a paper accepted or rejected from a journal or receiving one letter grade over another on a report.

The editing stage is where you put the finishing touches on your work.Start by taking some time away from your paper Need to get an alternative medicine paper high quality American 49 pages / 13475 words Business 30 days.Start by taking some time away from your paper.

Ideally, you began your paper early enough that you can refrain from looking at it for a day or two.However, if the deadline looms large, take an hour break at the very least.Come back to your paper and verify that it still expresses what you intended to say.

Where are the gaps in your story structure? What has not been explained clearly? Where is the writing awkward, making it difficult to understand your point? Consider reading the paper out loud first, and then print and edit a hard copy to inspect the paper from different angles.On the first run‐through of your paper, make sure you addressed all of the main ideas of the study.One way to achieve this is by writing down the key points you want to hit prior to re‐reading your paper.If your paper deviates from these points, you may need to delete some paragraphs.

In contrast, if you forgot to include something, add it in.To check the flow of your paragraphs, verify that a common thread ties each paragraph to the preceding one, and similarly, that each sentence within a paragraph builds on the previous sentence.Finally, re‐read the paper with a finer lens, editing sentence structure and word choice as you go to put the finishing touches on your work.Grammar and spelling are just as important as your scientific story; a poorly written paper will have limited impact regardless of the quality of the ideas expressed (Harley et al.After editing your own paper, ask someone else to read it.A classmate is ideal because he/she understands the assignment and could exchange papers with you.The editing steps described above also apply when editing someone else's paper.If a classmate is not available, try asking a family member or a friend.Having a fresh set of eyes examine your work may help you identify sections of your paper that need clarification.

This procedure will also give you a glimpse into the peer review process, which is integral to professional science writing (Guilford 2001).Don't be discouraged by negative comments—incorporating the feedback of reviewers will only strengthen your paper.Conclusion While the basics of writing are generally taught early in life, many people constantly work to refine their writing ability throughout their careers.Even professional scientists feel that they can always write more effectively.

How to write better essays nobody does introductions properly nbsp

Focusing on the strategies for success laid out in this guide will not only improve your writing skills, but also make the scientific writing process easier and more efficient.However, keep in mind that there is no single correct way to write a scientific paper, and as you gain experience with scientific writing, you will begin to find your own voice.Good luck and happy writing! Additional resources For those interested in learning more about the skill of scientific writing, we recommend the following resources Best website to order a college alternative medicine paper College Senior Formatting US Letter Size 66 pages / 18150 words.Good luck and happy writing! Additional resources For those interested in learning more about the skill of scientific writing, we recommend the following resources.

We note that much of the inspiration and concrete ideas for this step‐by‐step guide originated from Schimel's Writing Science: How to Write Papers that Get Cited and Proposals that Get Funded.Writing scientific manuscripts: a guide for undergraduates 10 Jan 2012 - Cambridge University says it wants more students from state schools.   Churchill College to discuss admissions to study natural sciences.   candidates are chasing just under 3,400 undergraduate places.   Next up is a girl from a leading private school, who was strong on paper but stumbled at interview..Writing scientific manuscripts: a guide for undergraduates.Journal of Young Investigators, California 10 Jan 2012 - Cambridge University says it wants more students from state schools.   Churchill College to discuss admissions to study natural sciences.   candidates are chasing just under 3,400 undergraduate places.   Next up is a girl from a leading private school, who was strong on paper but stumbled at interview..Journal of Young Investigators, California.Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 79: 171–172.A student's guide to writing in the life sciences order a accounting thesis proposal US Letter Size Standard 6 hours.A student's guide to writing in the life sciences.The President and Fellows of Harvard University, Massachusetts.

Writing science: how to write papers that get cited and proposals that get funded.Acknowledgments We thank Nichole Barger and the University of Colorado, Boulder 2016 graduate writing seminar for helpful discussions that greatly enhanced the quality of this essay.

Potential Conflicts of Interest Further help University of Derby students can access further information on academic writing on our Blackboard module - Improve your academic writing.Ultimate Guide to Academic Writing: 100+ Useful Resources - This guide reveals all the aspects of academic writing and contains links to useful resources that will boost students' writing skills.Study Advisor Scheme As part of our study skills services we provide help with essay structure, dissertation preparation and time management.To request a study advisor please visit us on the lower floor of Kedleston Rd library, or book an appointment online.Tutor's feedback - 75% This is an astute, and often sophisticated, essay which makes its arguments cogently.

One of its strengths is that you are making excellent use of citation both to support your points but also to move your argument along (for example, see double ticks on pp.There is also significant independent reading to secure an original, thoughtful approach to the question.Though tendentious, the topic is broached with a real flair for critical analysis (one is well aware of the limits of Hampson's defence of Conrad through the paragraph on p.Your conclusion is deft, with a very strong sense of the complexity of the issues.There is also the possibility, of course, that Conrad might identify with Marlow while at the same time undercutting his 'racism' not by expressing alternative perceptions but by plotting (see Peter Brooks, READING FOR THE PLOT as one way into this; Toni Morrison's PLAYING IN THE DARK is another take on Achebe's position).Second year student: international Security essay Discuss with examples how and why major international actors have been perceived as failing the victims of genocide pdf 98 KB Tutor's Feedback - 73% This is a well structured and fluently written essay with a clear argument, well done.The examples are appropriate and the evidence and quotations you have chosen highlight your argument well.

Why universities should teach alternative medicine the conversation

You could do more to say specifically why Bosnia, Rwanda and Armenia are cases of genocide at the start of the essay ? perhaps compare them against the UN Convention.You say they are all cases of genocide, but are they all exactly the same? Are there any differences between them that are of importance when considering outsiders' failure to prevent/end them? To push your argument further, think about the reasons why major international actors fail the victims of genocide: you give a few reasons, such as political and economic interests, reputation, the desire to avoid costly and indeterminate conflicts, UN bureaucratic inertia and so on.Could you systematise these at all? Are the reasons the same in each case, such that you can make a general claim, or does it vary case by case? In the bibliography, make sure you give the publisher of books 7 Mar 2017 - But writing a high-scoring paper doesn't need to be complicated.   from turning out two or three essays a week for his own undergraduate degree.   “Then you get to university and you're told to present one side of the argument and   forgot to mention - always, ALWAYS, refer to the treatment of time and  .Could you systematise these at all? Are the reasons the same in each case, such that you can make a general claim, or does it vary case by case? In the bibliography, make sure you give the publisher of books.

Second year student: Issues in Contemporary Anthropology essay Explore the meaning of 'radical evil' and the 'banality of evil' and how they might relate to understandings of evil using the cases of Idi Amin and Adolf Eichmann pdf 50 KB Tutor's Feedback - 75% Deals confidently with very complex issues (Arendt's 'banality of evil' vs Zizek's 'radical evil').Focuses on Leopold's work, but extends it considerably.

Rather longer than expected, but a well constructed argument, and generally well written (however p.2 'Disobeying orders was not an option for Eichmann.As a result conveying their agency the other Nazi officials do not qualify as banal' is unclear & may misrepresent Arendt's argument p.3 some confusion over Pottier's & Leopold's position.Interesting and original attempt to compare Arendt's analysis with Zizek's in relation to Amin.The conclusion needs more explanation about what is meant by 'everyday understandings of one refers to with the word in the on a daily basis' (sic) (Shame to have such a typo in the final sentence!).Nevertheless, a very good, thoughtful and original argument.Third year student: English literature essay Laurence Sterne and the Erotic: The Depiction of Sensibility in ‘A Sentimental Journey' pdf 99 KB Tutor's Feedback - 73% Yours is a beautifully clear essay.You write very well, and your prose is delightful to read.

You've also done your research and it shows.There is a remarkable lack of vagary about society or feminism in your piece, and you've picked canny quotes from your secondary sources that elucidate and situate your arguments.You've also located some wonderfully specific quotations from your primary source to support your argument that Hardy's narrator sympathises with Tess.Some of your close readings are wonderfully astute, as when you point out that Tess implores Angel, rather than commanding him.Slightly less persuasive is your assertion that Tess is the victim of Alec's eyes; I suspect you might have found better quotations, descriptions, or incidents denouncing Alec's gaze.

You are clearly very good at pursuing and proving an argument.I encourage you to be a bit more experimental in your next essay; perhaps choose a less straightforward topic and see where it takes you.Please see penciled notes throughout on shortening sentences and watching for comma splices (please look this term up in a style manual if it is unfamiliar).Second year student: Biomedical science essay Discuss the new insights in the understanding of Haemolytic Uraemic Syndrome and its worldwide implications following the large scale outbreak of E.

Best websites to write an paper alternative medicine originality british ama 6 hours business

Coli O104:H4 diarrhea in Germany 2011 pdf 680KB